The interviewer asks questions, the interviewee responds, with participants taking turns talking. Interviews usually involve a transfer of information from interviewee to interviewer, which is usually the primary purpose of the interview, although information transfers can happen in both directions one page pdf interview transcript. Interviews have a duration in time, in the sense that the interview has a beginning and an ending. Interviews are seen as a useful tool in assessing qualifications.
Psychologists use a variety of interviewing methods and techniques to try to understand and help their patients. Reporters can interview political candidates on television shows. Some services specialize in coaching people for interviews. Government officials may conduct interviews with prospective foreign students before allowing them to study in the nation. University of California: Science research associates. The selection interview from the interviewer and applicant perspectives: Can’t have one without the other.
New York City: Oxford University. Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value”. An empirical test of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview. Bureau of Labor Statistics Division of Information Services. Can a Failure Resume Help You Succeed?
This page was last edited on 11 January 2018, at 19:02. You’ve reached a retired site page. PBS no longer has the rights to distribute the content that had been provided on this page. Find program websites, online videos and more for your favorite PBS shows. Subscribe to our Previews newsletter for a sneak peek at your favorite programs. Watch local and national programs from anywhere at anytime.
Santorum’s views provoked criticism from Democratic politicians and other groups, but have been supported by some conservative Christians. United States Constitution”, and “sodomy laws properly exist to prevent acts which undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family. When Jordan asked “Okay, without being too gory or graphic, so if somebody is homosexual, you would argue that they should not have sex? In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality.
It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality. You have the right to anything. Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, whether it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family.
The AP released a transcript it described as “an unedited section” of the interview on April 23. Dean called on Santorum, “to resign from his post as Republican Conference chairman. Santorum’s comments were “out of step with our country’s respect for tolerance”. Santorum resign as chairman of the Republican Senate Caucus. Brad Woodhouse of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee called the comments, “divisive, hurtful and reckless. I think that he may have been inartful in the way that he described it.
Santorum’s comments in a written statement. The group said Santorum was “exactly right” and attributed criticism of Santorum to the “gay thought police”. Director of Concerned Women for America’s Culture and Family Institute, Robert Knight, criticized those Republicans who spoke out against Santorum, “Maybe they ought to think about switching parties. It shows great disloyalty to their party to join the sworn enemies in calling for the head . They’re doing their party a great disservice. Genevieve Wood supported Santorum’s remarks, and commented, “I think the Republican party would do well to follow Senator Santorum if they want to see pro-family voters show up on Election Day.
In a follow-up statement released after the Associated Press interview was published, Santorum said some of his remarks were “taken out of context”, and defended his comments in the interview asserting “It is simply a reflection of the law. I think this is a legitimate public policy discussion. These are not ridiculous comments. These are very much a very important point. Santorum defended his remarks, declaring that his comments were not intended to equate homosexuality with incest and adultery, but rather to challenge the specific legal position that the right to privacy prevents the government from regulating consensual acts among adults, a position he disputes, because he does not believe that there is a general constitutional right to privacy. Texas homosexuality law had been ruled unconstitutional, because states have no right to interfere with an individual’s choice of sexual partners, then the same ruling seems to imply that states have no right to legislate against incest, bigamy, adultery, polygamy, or any other mutually consensual sexual act not involving minors.