Fomenko and several other mathematicians. The idea of chronologies that differ from the conventional chronology can be traced back to at least the early 17th century. When later questioned on these results, Hardouin stated that he would reveal the monks’ reasons in a letter to history fiction or science pdf revealed only after his death.
The executors of his estate were unable to find such a document among his posthumous papers. Fomenko became interested in Morozov’s theories in 1973. The articles stirred a lot of controversy, but ultimately Fomenko failed to win any respected historians to his side. By the early 1990s, Fomenko shifted his focus from trying to convince the scientific community via peer-reviewed publications to publishing books.
Their constructions have nothing in common with Marxist historical science. By 1996 his theory had grown to cover Russia, Turkey, China, Europe, and Egypt. According to New Chronology, the traditional chronology consists of four overlapping copies of the “true” chronology shifted back in time by significant intervals with some further revisions. Names were translated, mispronounced and misspelled to the point where they bore little resemblance to originals.
According to Fomenko, this led early chronologists to believe or choose to believe that those accounts described different events and even different countries and time periods. Fomenko justifies this approach by the fact that, in many cases, the original documents are simply not available: Fomenko claims that all the history of the ancient world is known to us from manuscripts that date from the 15th century to the 18th century, but describe events that allegedly happened thousands of years before, the originals regrettably and conveniently lost. AD 1100, more than a full millennium after the events they describe, and they did not come to scholars’ attention until the 15th century. According to Fomenko, the 15th century is probably when these documents were first written. Central to Fomenko’s New Chronology is his claim of the existence of a vast Slav-Turk empire, which he called the “Russian Horde”, which he says played the dominant role in Eurasian history before the 17th century. Russia, are suffering from a historical delusion. Fomenko explains the seemingly vast differences in the biographies of these figures as resulting from difference in languages, points of view and time-frame of the authors of said accounts and biographies.