He has held various significant diplomatic and cabinet posts since the 1990s. Zarif was born to an “affluent, religiously devout dialogue among civilizations khatami pdf politically conservative merchant family in Tehran”.
Zarif was shielded from TV, radio, and newspapers by his parents as a youth. At age 17, he left Iran for the United States. His thesis was entitled, “Self-Defense in International Law and Policy. Ved Nanda, who taught and was on Zarif’s dissertation committee, recalled.
At that time I thought he’d play an important part in his country’s life. Zarif was appointed a member of the Iranian delegation to the United Nations in May 1982—largely due to his English-speaking ability and relationships in America, rather than formal diplomatic training. As a junior diplomat Zarif was involved in negotiations to win the release of U. United Nations envoy Giandomenico Picco.
Even though the United States did not make a promised reciprocal goodwill gesture at the time, Zarif remained committed to improving ties. In 2000, Zarif served as chairman of the Asian preparatory meeting of the World Conference on Racism and as the chairman of the United Nations Disarmament Commission. He was closely linked with developing the so-called “Grand Bargain,” a plan to resolve outstanding issues between the U. Zarif resigned from office on 6 July 2007. On 18 November 2008, Zarif claimed that Washington is conspiring to foment discord among Iranians in order to topple the Tehran government. The concept of a velvet revolution in Iran should not be considered as groundless fear. Stories spread that there was a secret agenda to his meetings with Iranian officials, involving claims that he came to convey messages from the United States and then to relay Iran’s response to White House officials.
It was the highest-level direct contact between the United States and Iran in the last six years. After the meeting, Kerry said that “We had a constructive meeting, and I think all of us were pleased that Foreign Minister Zarif came and made a presentation to us, which was very different in tone and very different in the vision that he held out with respect to possibilities of the future. Iran had been unable to accept the deal “at that particular moment”. He said “no amount of spinning” could change what had happened in Geneva, but it could “further erode confidence”.